cannabis plant for pesticide analysis

Pesticide Analysis Identification Criteria: Remember That Thing Called Retention Time?

by Julie Kowalski, jkSS, LLC

Setting analyte identification parameters is important and will play a large role in just about everything else especially determination of limit of detection, limit of quantitation and false positive/false negative rates. This seems straightforward because, of course, you must be able to identify your pesticides. Although parameters include retention time matching and mass spectral data, setting the actual criteria for your parameters will allow you to do or not do certain things…like meet regulatory maximum residue levels. This will largely be dictated by mass spectral criteria like ion ratio specifications.

But I want to discuss retention time, a chromatographic parameter, because care still needs to be taken when using it for compound identification. Why retention time? Because I know that it’s critical for pesticide analysis, has important consequences and it’s something many clients struggle with when developing pesticide methods. Let me walk you through a gap I see. Let’s set our criteria using the reference documents below (Ref 1 and 2). For example, retention times of an analyte in known standards and in samples should match, within a certain window like ±X.X minutes. This is fairly straightforward.

But first another retention time parameter is needed. To match retention times, you need a retention time. So, analytes should have a retention time longer than that of the time it takes an unretained compound to elute from the column. It is important that the analyte is actually retained on the column, not simply flowing through the column to the detector. The degree of retention is related to chemical interactions; this is what is specific about chromatographic data that makes it useful for compound identification. The elution time of an unretained compound is often called the “elution time of the void volume,” “void time” or casually referred to as the “solvent front.” There is little specificity in this because no retention, or chemical interaction, occurs making this type of data unsuitable for compound identification.

Lack of retention is a problem with polar pesticides, like daminozide or chlormequat chloride, when using a typical reversed phase LC separation popularly used for multi-residue methods. This is why some of these pesticides often require single analyte methods specifically designed to test difficult to retain pesticides. I see many cannabis pesticide testing methods published that have known polar pesticides in their multi-residue methods. It is important to ask about true retention of these polar pesticides. Look for void times in publications of these methods and ask your technology provider for this information if they are supplying you a method that includes polar pesticides. You can determine the void time experimentally or even use online calculators to get an estimate. After you know the void time of your system, you can confirm if your early eluting analytes are retained. You may have some more work to do otherwise…or at least know you are identifying compounds with only half of your parameters.


Reference 1
Guidelines for the Validation of Chemical Methods in Food, Feed, Cosmetics, and Veterinary Products by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Reference 2
Analytical Quality Control And Method Validation Procedures For Pesticide Residues Analysis In Food And Feed Document Nº SANTE/12682/2019 produced by the European Union Reference Laboratories.

Julie Kowalski is an advisor and technical consultant at JA Kowalski Science Support LLC who serves the cannabis and hemp testing markets. She partners with clients offering technical expertise and advise taking advantage of her nearly 20 years of laboratory experience. She specializes in developing fit-for-purpose technical programs and customized training for laboratory staff. Julie has a passion for analytical chemistry and the cannabis industry, starting work on cannabis testing in 2011. She brings a spirit of true collaboration and aptitude to her clients and to the developing cannabis science community. Julie can be reached at julie@kowalskiscience.com.

Share this post...
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Important Information for Our Customers

To Our Friends and Customers,

We recognize that these are unsettling times and we want you to know that the safety and health of our global community, including our valued customers and dedicated vendors, is of the utmost importance to us.

During this time, our commitment to you as a valued customer will continue to remain strong and steady. Our e-commerce lights will also remain on while our team across the country works virtually and practices strict social distancing.
 
We are in close contact with our vendors to ensure that customers like you are able to access all of our products and continue business as usual. I can say with confidence that we are well positioned in this regard due to the broad diversity among the vendors that we represent.
 
In an effort to help facilitate current strategic orders, we have stocked our warehouse with MilliporeSigma mobile phase solvents. In our experience, mobile phase solvents are an example of products that are imperative to operations and are often ordered with short lead time relative to operational needs. We are prepared to ship these products immediately and have also applied a discount.

Nothing is more important than your health and safety, and the need to protect those most vulnerable to the coronavirus. Please take care of yourselves and others.
 
Sincerely,

Ken Snoke
Founder, Emerald Scientific
Ken-Snoke